There are some crazy people out there. In the dark underworld of the world wide web. I am obviously not one of them myself.
But the rest of them, they are a bit crazy.
So one day last week for reasons best known to I don’t know who, I delved into the world of Christians (and others) arguing over specific points of doctrine on the internet. The comments centre around the main themes of everyone else being a false prophet, being illinformed and being at risk of their soul going to hell. So light reading then. Of course this does not represent everyone and it wasn’t a suprise to suddenly discover these people ‘out there’. And yet I managed to get sucked into reading more and more and becoming more and more irate.
Can this really be a good way to engage? I don’t know. But what does strike me as amusing is the knowledge that everyone knows that they are right and concerns me is the lack of compassion we can have for others when hidden by the annonymous internet. We statistically cannot all be right all the time but why do we so often think that everyone else must be wrong?
![pullman-jesus-cover[1]](http://limeyrathgam.files.wordpress.com/2010/04/pullman-jesus-cover1.jpg?w=510)
The book covers come in fashionable ipod black and white
Anyway that rant sort of leads me on to a book I have just read, and what this post is really about, called
The Good Man Jesus and the Scoundrel Christ by Phillip Pullman. It is the sort of book that Christians could write off as a subversive irreligious rant by an athiest hell bent on criticising the church but that would be a bit predictable and dull. Instead, read it and ponder what it can say to me? to us?
or in fact what is it actually saying in the first place?
Pullman’s book is fasinating because it doesn’t write off everything about Christianity. He doesn’t believe in God but he does know things about Christianity and about the ethics contained within the bible and so produces an interesting read. The book also clearly has on the back ‘This is a story’ and so he is not pretending that he is updating the bible. This is not The Message Bible by Phillip Pullman. Nor is Pullman asserting he has found some secret previously hidden by the church. It is a book that reflects on Jesus, institutionalized church and storytelling and mythology in general. One reviewer, Bishop Alan, suggests it is a contemporary myth about Jesus.
The book basically tells the story of twin brothers: Jesus, who is physically stronger, good, popular and represents the Jesus of the gospels. And his brother Christ, representing the institutional church, is a darker character, scheming, addicted to the magic and miracles, who subtly comments and re-writes the story of Jesus from the background and eventually betrays his brother to death.
One thing I heard Pullman say in an interview on the radio the other day is that he thinks that he gospels are for everyone and not just the property of Christians. Which I would have to agree with and it is interesting that it is Pullman that can provide a dialogue to discuss this. I have seen that some people have said that this could be a dangerous book, but I think if we say it is dangerous it is maybe because we fear such writing. I think it might be dangerous if Christians began to believe that only they had possession of the gospels, because are they not for everyone? And I don’t think we need to fear it, instead we can read it, examine it, disuss it, go back to the original bibical text.
Lots of other wiser more famous people have by the way recently reviewed this book, and in a lot more depth, such as Nick Baines and Rowan Williams and you may be interested to read what they have to say. I think it is particularly interesting to consider the two questions that Baines raises for Christians who read this book, 1. Why do we read the gospels in the way we do? and 2. why does the institutional church seem for many people so far away from the Jesus in the gospels?

Merchandise from the Mother Shop
There are as with all things some bad things about the book. And the section where Jesus is in the garden at Gethsemene doesn’t quite seem to hold with the way that the character has been up to this point. And if you read the book believing it was merely an addition or re-write of the gospels you might get yourself in a muddle. Furthermore some of the demythologising is quite light. But in conclusion I recommend the book, Christian or not, it is at any rate a good story and is worth a read.
By the way on a wholly seperate note, here is the requested photograph of the glow in the dark Mother Teresa, a striking likeness? Maybe not.
Recent Comments